ADATA Ultimate SU800 512GB SSD Review

ADATA Ultimate SU800 SSD
Print
by Robert Tanner on May 25, 2017 in Storage

ADATA is a well-known flash storage company that offers the most prolific range of SSD models currently available on the market. While this makes it hard to determine which SSD is best for you, it also guarantees there’s a model at practically every price point. Is the midrange SU800 that offers better endurance and performance consistency worth the increase in price over budget models? We find out.

Page 2 – Test Suite, PC Mark, Iometer & AS SSD

Benchmark Programs

Futuremark PCMark 08: Normal settings are used including the default setting of three runs. This gives us an extended test that takes roughly 45 minutes to complete, resulting in a sustained load that will thermally challenge drives. The free (demo) version is available on Steam for public use.

AS SSD: This handy little utility was custom-written for solid-state drives. We selected this program as by default it utilizes incompressible data and bypasses the Windows cache. This is another free program anyone can use to quickly test or verify normal performance of an SSD, available here.

ATTO: The bar graphs generated by this utility provide a huge amount of data in a condensed format. It is extremely handy for detecting problematic file sizes, performance bottlenecks, or simply inconsistent performance. Though this is significantly less of a problem today as solid-state drives have matured, it is an essential tool of any benchmark kit.

RoboCopy: This is Windows’ command-line utility included in most versions of Windows and provides for features beyond the default file copy handling of Windows Explorer. More information is available here. Windows Defender is also disabled to prevent bottlenecking the folder copy. We utilize a 9.81GB Movie file, and also a 1.6GB Folder with 11,511 files across 449 subfolders.

RAMdrive: Primo Software’s Ramdisk utility is a handy, convenient way to create a 12GB direct-IO ramdisk, meaning no indexing or caching is utilized and removes any bottlenecks associated with another storage device. File performance varies by I/O size but exceeds 6GB/s above 16KB IOPS.

Ramdisk

dBpoweramp R15.3: We convert 500 FLAC encoded music files (14.4GB) into Apple Lossless encoded files for playback on Apple devices. As no lossy compression is taking place, this minimizes the CPU workload while maximizing the amount of data written to the destination drive. Unfortunately this test would show more variance in results for systems with greater than four cores as dBpoweramp will fully load any size processor.

IOmeter – The most powerful piece of storage testing software freely available, IOmeter allows the creation of practically any kind of test workload. We first utilize it to dirty every new SSD before we test the basics of every solid-sate drive, namely random 4K read and writes, as well as 2MB sequential read and write performance.

Footnote – Disk I/O Tracing

If you are still reading our benchmark profile, thank you! It is not easy to devise tests that can tax a modern solid-state drive so if you have any suggestions or know of any software that you would like to see added to our test regimen, please let us know. We are especially eager to add disk I/O trace recording and playback to replace the batch file testing we utilized in past storage reviews. We are still looking into how to make this possible, so if you know of a piece of software that is free or doesn’t cost a few grand please do drop us a note!

Futuremark PCMark 8

ADATA SP550 480GB SSD - Futuremark PCMark 8
ADATA SU800 ADATA SP550 Transcend SSD370S Kingston Predator Samsung 950 PRO (Samsung NVMe)
World of Warcraft 58s 59s 58s 58s 57s
Battlefield 3 133s 134s 133s 133s 131s
Photoshop Light 114s 114s 114s 112s 110s
Photoshop Heavy 360s 374s 360s 355s 351s
Adobe InDesign 57s 60s 57s 57s 55s
Adobe After Effects 71s 71s 71s 71s 70s
Adobe Illustrator 72s 72s 72s 72s 71s
Microsoft Word 28s 28s 28s 28s 28s
Microsoft Excel 9s 9s 9s 9s 9s
Microsoft PowerPoint 9s 9s 9s 9s 9s

The SU800 kicks off by exceeding the venerable old Intel 520 in both bandwidth and overall storage score, delivering 37MB/s higher bandwidth than the budget SP550 and 49 more points overall.

Iometer 2010 1.1.0

ADATA SP550 480GB SSD - Iometer 2010 - IOPS Performance
ADATA SP550 480GB SSD - Iometer 2010 - Read and Write Performance

One thing to keep in mind is Iometer creates a test file that spans the entire size of the SSD. So it should come as no surprise that this effectively negates the SLC caching performance of the SP550. Because of this, the SU800 is able to easily exceed it in sustained write performance. The drive is even able to edge out both Intel drives here, making it the quickest SATA-based drive in our sequential read/write benchmarks.

For IOPS, the SU800 turned in not-quite double the Random 4K performance of the SP550 when using higher queue-depths, showing the drive is much more capable of extracting performance from parallel writes. However, even with a QD of one the drive offers 50% better random write IOPS than its budget SP550 cousin. Intel drives are optimized for random IOPS, so they swap positions with the SU800, which indicates the SU800 is optimized to favor sequential workloads.

AS SSD

ADATA SP550 480GB SSD - AS SSD - Scores
ADATA SP550 480GB SSD - AS SSD - Read and Write Performance
ADATA SP550 480GB SSD - AS SSD - Copy Performance
AS SSD – Latencies Read Write
ADATA SP550 (480GB) 0.035ms 0.034ms
ADATA SU800 (512GB) 0.032ms 0.035ms
Intel 520 (240GB) 0.110ms 0.173ms
Intel 730 (240GB) 0.032ms 0.032ms
Kingston Predator (240GB) 0.041ms 0.047ms
Samsung 950 PRO (Microsoft NVMe) 0.027ms 2.670ms
Samsung 950 PRO (Samsung NVMe) 0.023ms 0.021ms
Transcend SSD370S (512GB) 0.032ms 0.035ms

By default AS SSD uses a 1GB file for its test run, and that is what we utilized in our tests, though this can be modified. Results are mixed as the file fits easily within the SP550’s fast-write cache, though the SU800 is still able to deliver strong 4K random write performance at higher queue-depths. The SU800 does not fare much better in the copy tests either.

Support our efforts! With ad revenue at an all-time low for written websites, we're relying more than ever on reader support to help us continue putting so much effort into this type of content. You can support us by becoming a Patron, or by using our Amazon shopping affiliate links listed through our articles. Thanks for your support!