Latest News Posts

Social
Latest Forum Posts

Kingston HyperX 240GB SATA 6Gbit/s SSD Review
Bookmark and Share

kingston_hyperx_240gb_ssd_091911_article.gif
Print
by Robert Tanner on September 19, 2011 in Solid-State Drives

Kingston may of been fashionably late to the SandForce party, but its explanation for wanting to avoid the issues that have (and still) plague other manufacturers is sound. Its first SandForce offerings appropriately fall under the HyperX branding, and offer speeds to take full advantage of the new SATA 6Gb/s bus.

Real-World: File Transfers, Adobe Lightroom

Finally, we reach the first of our real-world tests where there are no unusual testing or scoring algorithms to leave us scratching our heads, just simple tests to see how an SSD changes actual system performance.

For the File Transfer test we took a 4.5GB archive and timed how much time was required to transfer the file to another destination on the same drive. Keep in mind that with a hard disk, this requires the actuator arm to seek back and forth between the source and destination sectors of the disk platter, while any SSD can concurrently read and write to separate flash chips at once.

The Kingston HyperX 240GB has no trouble shaving a few seconds off its closest competitor’s time, and comes fairly close to the toggle-NAND based V3MI in the process. Considering SandForce drives are already in a league of their own, it makes for a very strong showing.

Adobe Lightroom 3.4

With Adobe Lightroom, importing image files with “Copy” simply acts like a file transfer, exactly like our previous test. Rather than simply time how long it takes to create a duplicate set of 500 RAW files we elected to choose the “Copy as DNG” import option. This will convert the NEF files (Nikon’s equivalent to RAW) into the Digital Negative standard while importing them to its image library.

This test was not particularly effective as Adobe Lightroom 3.4 only spawns two threads, meaning that even with the power of a Core i7 that has eight threads available, the CPU was still the main bottleneck. When Adobe deems fit to update Lightroom to take advantage of more threads we will see a real need for faster storage here, as such a task as this is perfectly suited for high thread parallelization.

Interestingly the HyperX edges out a narrow victory here, and regardless of the Lightroom thread count, still shaves well over two minutes off the completion time compared to a mechanical drive.