Latest News Posts

Social
Latest Forum Posts

Palit GeForce 9600GSO Sonic 768MB
Bookmark and Share

palit_9600gso_review_logo.jpg
Print
by Rob Williams on May 22, 2008 in NVIDIA-Based GPU

On a budget and need the best bang for the buck? NVIDIA’s new 9600 GSO might be the answer, despite not being that different from a 9600 GT. We are taking a look at Palit’s Sonic version of the card, which comes pre-overclocked, doubles the memory and includes adapters for both HDMI and VGA.

Enemy Territory: Quake Wars


Each graph for our benchmarking results are labeled with the resolution that the game was played at, while omitting secondary settings such as Anti-Aliasing, Anisotropic Filtering, texture quality, et cetera. To view all specific settings that we used, please refer to our testing methodology page, where screenshots show the exact settings used.

Enemy Territory: Quake Wars

The last game we will be using in our benchmarks is ET: Quake Wars. This is also the only game in our testing that’s executed as a time demo, as opposed to the manual play through like the rest of our games. The reason for this is twofold.

The first reason is that we like to include at least one time demo, despite its CPU-boundedness, in order to see how our cards scale when run in such a situation. The second is the fact that this game caps its FPS at 60, except during time demos.

Our time demo takes place in the Area 22 level, with the main goal to destroy the jamming generator. The actual play through took around five minutes, but the time demo goes far quicker, as is the case with most time demos.

Settings: Maxed settings are used here for the most part. Our 1680 resolution uses 2x AA while 1920 and 2560 use 4x.

Similar to our UTIII results, ET: QW wasn’t fond of the slower clocks of the GSO, and again, 2560×1600 performance was not ideal, but the lower resolutions were fine. That’s not much of a valid argument, though, as I’m sure those who own 30-inch monitors are looking for higher-end cards, not a lowly GSO.


Advertisement