View Single Post
Old 09-11-2009, 08:41 PM   #3
Rob Williams
Editor-in-Chief
 
Rob Williams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlantic Canada
Posts: 13,347
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kougar
I wonder if Sony made the decision to remove backwards compatibility not just to save a few dollars off the production cost of their new console, but to also not deter from their unusually strong PS2 sales.
If it's the loss of PS2 sales Sony is worried about, then they should just release a more-expensive version of the PS3 that includes the hardware required for the emulation. Like you said, the chips can't be more than $15, but add the feature to the PS3, along with some other perks, and you'd imagine Sony would come out even further ahead than off a PS2 sale (although I'm not sure how much Sony clears off of one of these).

At least the PS2 is still being sold though for those who want it. That plays PS1 games as well, so overall, Sony's solution for playing older games is still far superior to Microsoft's.
__________________
Intel Core i7-3960X, GIGABYTE G1.Assassin 2, Kingston 16GB DDR3-2133, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 2GB
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB SSD (OS, Apps), WD VR 1TB (Games), Corsair 1000HX, Corsair H70 Cooler
Corsair 800D, Dell 2408WFP 24", ASUS Xonar Essence STX, Gentoo (KDE 4.11. 3.12 Kernel)

"Take care to get what you like, or you will be forced to like what you get!" - H.P. Baxxter
<Toad772> I don't always drink alcohol, but when I do, I take it too far.


Rob Williams is offline   Reply With Quote