<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Look at Steam’s Hardware Survey for October 2012</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techgage.com/news/a-look-at-steams-hardware-survey-for-october-2012/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techgage.com/news/a-look-at-steams-hardware-survey-for-october-2012/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-look-at-steams-hardware-survey-for-october-2012</link>
	<description>PC enthusiasts one-stop resource for high-quality reviews, articles and current technology news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 19:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Williams</title>
		<link>http://techgage.com/news/a-look-at-steams-hardware-survey-for-october-2012/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techgage.com/?post_type=news&#038;p=17671#comment-118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmm, I didn&#039;t think of that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, I didn&#8217;t think of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kougar</title>
		<link>http://techgage.com/news/a-look-at-steams-hardware-survey-for-october-2012/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Kougar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techgage.com/?post_type=news&#038;p=17671#comment-116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or maybe all those idlers &amp; bot users upgraded their virtual XP machines to newer VM software that correctly reported their video card?  I have always been slightly dubious of the extremely low-end numbers given the sheer number of tf2 idlers that do this...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or maybe all those idlers &amp; bot users upgraded their virtual XP machines to newer VM software that correctly reported their video card?  I have always been slightly dubious of the extremely low-end numbers given the sheer number of tf2 idlers that do this&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Williams</title>
		<link>http://techgage.com/news/a-look-at-steams-hardware-survey-for-october-2012/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techgage.com/?post_type=news&#038;p=17671#comment-97</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yup... crazy isn&#039;t it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup&#8230; crazy isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marfig</title>
		<link>http://techgage.com/news/a-look-at-steams-hardware-survey-for-october-2012/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Marfig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 19:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techgage.com/?post_type=news&#038;p=17671#comment-95</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Across these big categories, the biggest difference seen is with DX10/DX11 GPUs under Windows XP. Since August, the share has increased from 4.38% to 9.98%.&quot;


A weird increase that should make us think. The amount of folks, making use of unsupported cards more than doubled!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Across these big categories, the biggest difference seen is with DX10/DX11 GPUs under Windows XP. Since August, the share has increased from 4.38% to 9.98%.&#8221;</p>
<p>A weird increase that should make us think. The amount of folks, making use of unsupported cards more than doubled!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.003 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 199/202 objects using memcached

 Served from: techgage.com @ 2013-05-26 00:57:54 by W3 Total Cache -->