Comments on: H.265 Gets Approved – Focuses on High-Quality at Low Bandwidth http://techgage.com/news/h-265-gets-approved-focuses-on-high-quality-at-low-bandwidth/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=h-265-gets-approved-focuses-on-high-quality-at-low-bandwidth PC enthusiasts one-stop resource for high-quality reviews, articles and current technology news. Tue, 21 May 2013 22:56:00 +0000 hourly 1 By: RainMotorsports http://techgage.com/news/h-265-gets-approved-focuses-on-high-quality-at-low-bandwidth/#comment-727 RainMotorsports Mon, 28 Jan 2013 17:12:00 +0000 http://techgage.com/?post_type=news&p=18360#comment-727 Well of course H.265 is aimed at mobile so processor demand is not necessarily a luxury when you consider you want to record on the device to it. But I am with you. I would love to sacrifice time encoding for better bitrates at visually identical quality. Even with hardware encoders and time I don’t think I would target such a trade off to H.265, need a second standard just to have options. But I can’t wait for this to saturate the market.

]]> By: Jamie Fletcher http://techgage.com/news/h-265-gets-approved-focuses-on-high-quality-at-low-bandwidth/#comment-726 Jamie Fletcher Mon, 28 Jan 2013 14:51:00 +0000 http://techgage.com/?post_type=news&p=18360#comment-726 I wouldn’t mind if the processing demand was higher if we could get lower bit-rates for comparable quality. Broadband speeds are barely budging, and bandwidth caps run rife; however, processing power is increasing exponentially. If a codec is too demanding now, it doesn’t mean it won’t be later. Maybe this is the approach taken with h.265.

One comment I do need to make though… royalties. Will it be the same system as h.264, a bait and switch later, or an up-front cost? Guess we’ll find out later.

]]> By: The Focus Elf http://techgage.com/news/h-265-gets-approved-focuses-on-high-quality-at-low-bandwidth/#comment-725 The Focus Elf Mon, 28 Jan 2013 14:08:00 +0000 http://techgage.com/?post_type=news&p=18360#comment-725 I was all excited when I heard the words “Google Fibre” and then realized it was only STILL in Kansas and Missouri. H.265 does appear great, sure as I’ve been converting content to H.264 it did seem a little bloated. What is the “minor” way you are expecting to see the H.265 codec appear?

]]>