Latest News Posts

Social
Latest Forum Posts

OCZ Vector 256GB SSD Review
Bookmark and Share

OCZ_Vector_SSD
Print
by Robert Tanner on January 14, 2013 in Solid-State Drives

Vector is OCZ’s first SSD release since the ushering in of a new CEO and fresh perspective on its direction. It’s also the first SSD to come equipped with both in-house firmware and controller. In effect, OCZ has built its Vector SSD from the ground up with its rich internal resources – has it paid off?

Test System & Methodology

At Techgage, we strive to make sure our results are as accurate and real-world applicable as possible. We list most of the steps and processes involved in setting up and conducting our benchmarking process below, but in the interests of brevity we can’t mention every last detail. If there is any pertinent information that we’ve inadvertently omitted or you have any thoughts, suggestions, or critiques, then please feel free to email us or post directly in our forums. This site exists for readers like you and we value your input.

The table below lists the hardware used in our current storage-testing machine, which remains unchanged throughout all of our testing, with the obvious exception of the storage device. Each drive used for the sake of comparison is also listed here.

  Techgage Solid-State Drive Test System
Processor Intel Core i7-2600 – 3.80GHz (Locked) Quad-Core
Motherboard ASUS P8P67 Deluxe
Memory 4GB Kingston DDR3-2133
Graphics AMD Radeon HD 5770
Storage Hitachi 7200RPM 2TB Hard Drive
Crucial m4 256GB
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB
OCZ Vector 256GB
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB
Power Supply Antec NeoHE 550W
Cooling Noctua DH-14
Et cetera Dell 2407WFP (1920×1200)
Lite-on DVD-RW
Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 64-bit

Our Windows 7 Desktop for SSD Testing

When preparing our SSD testbed for benchmarking we follow these guidelines:

General Guidelines

  • The Core i7-2600 processor is turbo-locked at 3.5GHz for result consistency.
  • No power-saving options are enabled in the motherboard’s EFI.
  • AHCI is enabled in the motherboard’s EFI for best performance.
  • Only the Intel 6Gb/s port controller is used for test drives.
  • Only cold boots are utilized; for the purposes of our testing a boot is defined as the moment the power button is depressed to the moment the last systray icon and program has fully loaded after reaching the Windows 7 desktop. Auto-login is enabled.

Windows 7 Optimizations

  • User Account Control (UAC) is disabled.
  • The OS is kept clean; no scrap files are left in between runs.
  • Windows Update and OS power-saving settings are disabled.

For our new Sandy Bridge storage testbed we have migrated to using test images for our drives. All drives are imaged with the cloned test image to ensure all drivers, programs, and settings remain identical for testing purposes. We feel disk cloning software and SSD controller technology has matured to the point where potential issues such as non-aligned sectors are no longer a potential issue.

For testing, we run all tests five times dropping the highest and lowest results, then take the average of the middle three. And who said that college statistics class wouldn’t prove useful? If any anomalous results are seen the test will be run again. Given the complexities of modern computers, and especially today’s operating systems and the software that runs on them, we feel this provides the most accurate results possible.

Finally, we are seeking to constantly improve and expand upon our SSD testing methodology. We are always actively seeking real-world workload scenarios that are bottlenecked by hard drives, so if you have any suggestions whatsoever or there is a program you would like to see included in our SSD content, then please drop by our forums and let us know! We are always looking to expand our SSD benchmarks and provide more useful and real-world results, and not just synthetic numbers.


  • http://techgage.com/ Brett Thomas

    Looks like OCZ is finally making good on its promises. It’s a little unfair to put this success on the new CEO (products like this were all under design from the old management and the roadmap was well in the works), but I think the new leadership will hopefully help to keep the company “on track” with this success. This is impressive, and though the price may be a little higher, I can’t imagine people wouldn’t be willing to pay that premium in many environments. Just looking at these figures makes me think it might be time to make a switch for some of our office systems.

    • http://www.facebook.com/deathspawner Rob Williams

      I had concerns about this drive leading up to its launch, but OCZ delivered on all accounts. Unlike many SSDs, it doesn’t have a strength in just one area… it’s fast as hell all-around. I’m pretty excited to see what the company has in store next.

    • Kougar

      Thanks for the feedback!

      It was not my intention to give the new CEO credit for this drive as you are indeed correct. Development of the Vector has been between 6-12 months from what I’ve heard, longer than typical for OCZ drives and long before Ryan Petersen was ousted. I was merely attempting to point out OCZ has done a number of things differently, both with this SSD and within the company itself as part of an overall concerted effort.