Latest News Posts

Social
Latest Forum Posts

Synology DS213+ NAS Server Review
Bookmark and Share

Synology DS213+ NAS Box
Print
by Greg King on September 4, 2013 in Network-Attached Storage

A great thing about the NAS market is that competition is huge, and in our minds, Synology has done a fantastic job of making sure that this competition has been keeping on its toes. Each one of the company’s NASes we’ve tested to date have impressed, and fortunately, the DS213+ isn’t about to become an exception.

Testing & Final Thoughts

Our testing procedures have been documented in past reviews, but to recap, here is our process.

A few years ago, Intel created its own benchmarking tool for NAS devices called NASPT. Short for NAS Performance Toolkit, NASPT is, to quote Intel itself, “a file system exerciser and analysis tool designed to enable direct measurement of home network attached storage (NAS) performance.” Essentially what it did was create a tool that mimics day-to-day workloads such as video playback, content creation and office productivity application emulation.

By creating this tool, Intel has made it extremely easy on those of us tasked with benchmarking NAS devices. You install NASPT on a host machine (recommended specs are 32-bit XP SP2 and 2GB of RAM), map a drive on that host that points to the NAS and decide on which tests to run. These are the specs that I used when building our test machine.

Test System

  • Dell Optiplex 755
  • Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
  • 2GB DDR2 RAM
  • 320GB Seagate 7200 RPM
  • Integrated Video
  • Intel PRO/1000 PT Dual Port NIC

Our testbed is a simple, everyday machine that I happened to pick up cheap on Craigslist. It’s a very capable PC and one that works perfectly for the NASPT test.

An additional test that we are using in this review is a simple file copy to the DS213+ and then from the DS213+.  Using the Windows utility Robocopy, a 4GB file is transferred to the DS213+and then back to the local machine after a reboot of the host machine.  This test is run three times, with the read and write times recorded and averaged out.

Robocopy

  RAID 0 (MB/s) RAID 1 (MB/s)
Read 97 93
Write 81 78

Intel NASPT

  RAID 0 (MB/s) RAID 1 (MB/s)
HD Video Playback 83.3 81.4
2x HD Playback 92.3 95.4
4x HD Playback 91.1 93.6
HD Video Record 98.5 82.3
HD Playback and Record 83.1 71.6
Content Creation 10.3 7.8
Office Productivity 49.4 46.1
File Copy to NAS 98.9 98.2
File Copy from NAS 92.7 92.1
Directory Copy to NAS 21.2 19.1
Directory Copy from NAS 21.6 20.2
Photo Album 11.9 12.1

Final Thoughts

The numbers speak for themselves: The DS213+ is the new reigning champ for performance.  It’s easily the fastest NAS box I have ever tested and a quick look online shows that it’s currently selling for around $385 USD.  While not cheap, there is a lot of performance to be had for that asking price.  Compared to past units we have reviewed, there really isn’t any comparison. 

That being said, we are working to get other units in for review, 4 bay boxes included.  Obviously, performance is going to increase with each new hardware refresh a manufacturer does.  With Synology, or anyone really, this is to be expected.  Where Synology truly shines is with its firmware.  Having used Synology devices in my test lab and at home on my network, I have never had a major issue with that software.  While the hardware is robust, the options offered to the community at large are breathtaking.  This is honestly something that other NAS vendors can take a look at because the modular design of Synology’s firmware has been the future for a few years now.  By adding particular add-ons, such as Squeeze Center or Plex*, you can transform your NAS box from a simple dumb backup destination on your network into a robust server that works for you.

*Plex is available, but in my experience, is not recommended for those NAS boxes that don’t come with an Intel Atom CPU installed.

Synology DS213+ NAS Box

While Synology lacks the external finish of say, a NETGEAR ReadyNAS and its metal design, it more than makes up for it with features.  The developers at Synology seem to outdo themselves with each subsequent release of their firmware.  Add in the ability to share iSCSI LUNs and shares over NFS, the nod towards Synology when looking for a new NAS is made that much easier.

The DS213+ is fast.  It’s also expensive.  For the price, you are flirting with the lower end of the 4 bay NAS price range.  You sacrifice performance for additional storage and redundancy, but for many, that will be an easy call.  For me, I personally like the idea of presenting part, or all, of your Synology storage to a VMware host and using it for a shared datastore.  Again, the options are great with a NAS like this.

Simply put: Anyone looking for a fast, high performing NAS should so themselves a solid and check out the DS213+ from Synology.

Synology DS213+ NAS Server - Techgage Editor's Choice
Synology DS213+ NAS Server

Page List:
Top

1. Introduction
2. Testing & Final Thoughts


  • http://techgage.com/ Rob Williams

    It might be a bit expensive, but its featureset backs that up. It seems perfect for a small business or for someone who needs a robust NAS solution at the home but doesn’t have serious storage needs. You’re right – at that price, the lower-end 4-bay NASes become pretty intriguing.

  • http://www.norrafi.net Norrafi

    I prefer Ds213 than it + version. 213 equipped with ARM processor.

    • Greg King

      The DS213+ uses an ARM based processor as well.

  • The Focus Elf

    I think I am going to buy this, based almost entirely on your review. Now I just need to determine what HDDs to buy, the Seagate NAS 2TB drives seem to get the best reviews, 3TB seems to be a reliability hurdle… I like setting these systems up with mirroring, but I don’t like to have to USE the mirroring feature… =]

    • Greg King

      This is wonderful to hear, thank you for the comments.

      While I tested with 1TB 7200 RPM drives, I run WD green drives at home in my personal NAS boxes and have not had a single issue with them. I have both 2TB and 3TB in use and again, I’ve yet to have an issue. I would determine what you intend to use the NAS for. Will it be data retention, sharing or media streaming? Obviously you can get away with slower disks if its simple backups. The WD Red drives are solid middle ground but a high performer would be the black drives.

      Keep us posted on your build. I’m always grateful to hear that our reviews helped someone make a decision… that’s why we are in this business. :)

      • The Focus Elf

        Wow and an update. I ended up buying it, put some 2TB drives in there and love the unit. Thanks again Greg!

    • http://techgage.com/ Rob Williams

      When it comes to NAS drives, I’d go with whichever can be had at a better price. I trust both Seagate and WD for these needs completely.

  • Yousif Elamin

    just i want to help me , we stay in one home and using same network with another person , he insert this device on network what is purpose of DS213 on network because i thing that he want to take information from may laptop
    pls help me

    • Greg King

      Yousif,

      With a storage device on the network, data from an unprotected PC (your laptop), could be stored on it. That being said, if your roommate wanted to take data on your laptop, he could already do so with his own laptop. With a Synology, you can administer who can access to it so you might ask for the ability to log into it and check on what he has setup. The most important thing you can do, if you don’t trust your roommate, is secure your laptop with a strong password. From there, it’s dealing with your roommate, which will always be the most difficult.

  • Msdcs

    I have had this model for over a year, it has run 24/7 and never had problems, it is perfect.

    • http://techgage.com/ Rob Williams

      Glad to hear it’s working out well!