Latest News Posts

Social
Latest Forum Posts

ATI Radeon HD 5770 CrossFireX Performance
Bookmark and Share

ati_radeon_hd5770_crossfirex_120709.jpg
Print
by Rob Williams on December 7, 2009 in AMD-Based GPU

Want to purchase a Radeon HD 5870, but can’t find one in stock? One alternative to consider is instead purchasing two Radeon HD 5770’s to take advantage of CrossFireX. Not only does this solution save you up to $80 at current pricing, but it proved in our results to offer even better performance in select titles, such as with Modern Warfare 2.

F.E.A.R. 2: Project Origin

Five out of the seven current games we use for testing are either sequels, or titles in an established series. F.E.A.R. 2 is one of the former, following up on the very popular First Encounter Assault Recon, released in fall of 2005. This horror-based first-person shooter brought to the table fantastic graphics, ultra-smooth gameplay, the ability to blow massive chunks out of anything, and also a very fun multi-player mode.

Three-and-a-half years later, we saw the introduction of the game’s sequel, Project Origin. As we had hoped, this title improved on the original where gameplay and graphics were concerned, and it was a no-brainer to want to begin including it in our testing. The game is gorgeous, and there’s much destruction to be had (who doesn’t love blowing expensive vases to pieces?). The game is also rather heavily scripted, which aides in producing repeatable results in our benchmarking.

Manual Run-through: The level used for our testing here is the first in the game, about ten minutes in. The scene begins with a travel up an elevator, with a robust city landscape behind us. Our run-through begins with a quick look at this cityscape, and then we proceed through the level until the point when we reach the far door as seen in the above screenshot.

The perks of the HD 5770 flip-flop here a little bit, and there’s no true master. At 1680×1050, the single HD 5870 saw better performance over our CrossFireX setup (in all fairness, who’s going to notice the difference between 148 FPS and 169 FPS?). We saw the same thing happen at 2560×1600 as well, although the differences are minor, and both cards deliver great performance.

Graphics Card
Best Playable
Min FPS
Avg. FPS
NVIDIA GTX 295 1792MB (Reference)
2560×1600 – Max Detail, 4xAA, 16xAF
45
95.767
ATI HD 5870 1GB (Reference)
2560×1600 – Max Detail, 4xAA, 16xAF
65
91.34
ATI HD 5770 1GB CrossFireX

2560×1600 – Max Detail, 4xAA, 16xAF
57
87.194
ATI HD 5850 1GB (ASUS)
2560×1600 – Max Detail, 4xAA, 16xAF
51
73.647
NVIDIA GTX 285 1GB (EVGA)
2560×1600 – Max Detail, 4xAA, 16xAF
39
62.014
NVIDIA GTX 275 896MB (Reference)
2560×1600 – Max Detail, 4xAA, 16xAF
37
57.266
ATI HD 4890 1GB (Sapphire)
2560×1600 – Max Detail, 4xAA, 16xAF
38
56.726
ATI HD 4870 1GB (Reference)
2560×1600 – Max Detail, 4xAA, 16xAF
34
50.555
NVIDIA GTX 260 896MB (XFX)
2560×1600 – Max Detail, 4xAA, 16xAF
29
48.110
ATI HD 5770 1GB (Reference)
2560×1600 – Max Detail, 4xAA, 16xAF
31
47.411
ATI HD 5750 1GB (Sapphire)
2560×1600 – Max Detail, 0xAA, 16xAF
27
39.563
NVIDIA GTX 250 1GB (EVGA)
2560×1600 – Max Detail, 4xAA, 16xAF
24
36.331

F.E.A.R. 2 might be a leading PC title where graphics are concerned, but it doesn’t require an ultra-powerful machine for a gamer to experience it at high-end settings. Thanks to this, all of our cards, ranging from $130 up to $500 are able to handle the game at the max detail settings. Better cards will make the game more fluid, of course, but none of these throttle gameplay at those settings.


Advertisement