Should you buy Vista Ultimate?

[PAGETITLE=Introduction] Vista is right around the corner after years of our incessant waiting. This is not an article to explain why you need Vista, because as it stands nobody "needs" it. In the future, when DirectX 10 and Vista-specific software is commonplace, that will be the time when the move will become more of a requirement. Until then, Vista is just a new version of Windows pimped up with a fresh coat of paint. This is an article to cater to those who -are- going to buy Vista regardless of whether they need it or not. Although there are 8 different versions (at least), only four are targeted to the regular consumer. Home Basic is the barebones version that doesn't include any of the special extras. Business is targeted for that specific audience but may be of interest to those who want better security but don't require some of the more "fun" add-ons such as Media Center and Solitaire. In this article though, I will be comparing Ultimate to what will likely be the most common version of Vista, Home Premium. As it stands, Home Premium will retail for $239USD while Ultimate will for $399. This is a huge price differential and the reason I became inspired to write this article. Its no secret... Ultimate is packed. It includes everything the three other versions do, with the addition of BitLocker. But as I examined things, I came to the conclusion that a fair percentage of people who shell out the extra $160 for the Ultimate Edition may not even use most of the extra features that are available. Home Premium versus Ultimate Microsoft has done a good job of clearly explaining the differences between versions on their website, so I had an idea of what to look for. Quickly referring to that list, you can see that Home Premium is essentially what Windows XP MCE was, since it includes the full media center. The prime difference between Home Premium and Ultimate is that the latter includes better security tools and business apps. What Home Premium does include assures me that it is indeed worth the $239USD price tag. I am not saying I am particularly pleased with Vista overall, because I have run into a good share of problems in the past few months since the RTM became available. The fact that it includes all of the games, media center and new Vista core programs such as Meeting Space helps it become a feature-rich OS out of the box. Granted we are now in 2007, but the Windows XP installation was incredibly bland. Vista seems to make up for this. Of course, I am not getting into what Ultimate has that Home Premium doesn't, so let's soar through what you -would- be missing if you don't get the $399 edition. BitLocker Drive Encryption BitLocker is a key feature for the Ultimate and Enterprise editions; You cannot get them in the other versions at all. Because of this, it may be the prime reason you would want to slam down that extra cash, but is it worth it? Sadly, I wish I was able to tell you. I spent a good four hours working with BitLocker, or rather working to get it functional. To no avail. BitLocker is a program designed to ease the minds of corporate titans everywhere. How often do we hear news of an important laptop being stolen? At least twice a week. That's where BitLocker comes in. It's a full file system encryption program that locks up the drive entirely when the computer is shut off. That's where things become interesting. In order to access Windows or the data, you -need- the key that coincides with the drive. When you first set up BitLocker, you will have the ability to save this key to a thumb drive. So, you plug in your thumb drive and are good to go. If you boot up without the key however, the computer will be completely non-functional, at least until another hard drive is installed, at which point you'd lose your data. There are big pluses to this, but also downsides. Imagine for a second that you lost your thumb drive and your computer became completely inoperable. On the other side of the coin though, I don't see this technology being designed for home users, but rather businesses. If a laptop gets stolen, then the data is safe. Not just their data, but OUR data most times. If a laptop or thumb drive is lost/stolen, then a new laptop could be purchased and the databases re-synced. In a home scenario, a user would have to back up constantly to an external drive, which would somewhat defeat the purpose since that unencrypted hard drive could as easily become stolen like the rest of the computer. The reason I can't comment on the performance or ease of use is that I could not get BitLocker to function on the two computers I tested it on. I believe this is due to the fact that neither BIOS supported TPM which BitLocker requires. That's why I am led to believe that this technology is directly targeted to laptops where such features are standard in a proprietary BIOS. One thing you will want to realize is that if your BIOS does support TPM and you are ready to make the BitLocker leap, you will need to read through a LOT of documentation. There will be a fair amount of tweaking and partition creation. You would be wise to understand exactly how it works or else you may screw yourself over. [PAGEBREAK] [PAGETITLE=Advanced Backup Capabilities] Vista Ultimate boasts the fact that it has better security features than the other versions, except Business and Enterprise which contain the same general sets of tools. While all versions of Vista contain a simple file backup tool, Ultimate has the ability to backup the entire computer. This includes your files, applications, games, registry entries and so forth. The great thing about this though, is that it doesn't -only- backup your primary operating system. If you have other versions of Vista installed or Windows XP, you will have the option to back those up as well. You are supposed to run this tool after a fresh install once your main slew of applications are installed. That way, you have a completely clean system that's problem free. You do have the ability to back up your PC like this in the future, but you shouldn't overwrite the original backup, as your newer backup may contain the same potential virus or data corruption. To give a test, I backed up both my Windows XP and primary Vista installation. The resulting backup took around 8GB, but this would be higher had these not been fresh installations. The process took around 6 minutes, not too bad for that amount of data. After months of use with many documents, this process could easily take more than an hour or two. Depending on where you decided to save the backup, Vista will catalog the computer and split the backup into various archives, each one containing a certain part of the computer, ie: the registry. There will also be a huge archive for each of the installations you are backing up. My Windows XP archive was 1.5GB while Vista Ultimate was just over 5GB. Above - Ultimate (Left) / Home Premium (Right) Given the fact that I had multiple versions of Windows installed on a single hard drive, I didn't want to perform a more in-depth test in case anything went awry. What I did do though, was reboot into my Windows XP installation and delete most of my registry. I exported the sections I removed in case the restore didn't work. In addition, I also installed Need for Speed: Carbon under the Vista installation to see if it would remain there after the restore. To proceed with a restore, you first need to use the original installation disc and choose "Repair this computer" at the initial menu. You then need to click the installation you want fixed and after messing around through some menus, you can find the backup you want. At this point, it will tell you when the backup was created and what hard drives it affects. After agreeing to the restore and waiting about 5 minutes, the entire process is complete. Happily, the restore process went completely smooth and the system was reverted to the same state it was when I created the backup. The incredibly screwed up Windows XP installation had all the registry entries restored and worked well. The same goes for the Vista install... the game was not there anymore. Overall, I'm happy to report great experiences with this. There's another thing to consider as well. Take a scenario where you have a 250GB hard drive with a WinXP and Vista partition, and then it fails. You upgrade to a 750GB drive and want to restore that backup. During the restore process, it will give you an option to format the entire drive and recreate the same sized partitions that were there before. This is to keep things congruent, but you must resize or merge the remaining space after the restore. I only tested a rather simple test, but I don't have any doubt that it will work well in any situation as long as you keep the backup in a safe place. That's another thing to consider. It would be foolish to store this all-important backup on the same hard drive. If it crashes, you basically wasted your time. [PAGEBREAK] [PAGETITLE=Ultimate Extras] Remember the classic Plus! packs that Microsoft released alongside a launch of their new OS? The Plus! pack with XP was rather lackluster and didn't warrant a purchase as far as I am concerned. What it did include though were a few additional mini-games, themes and other miscellaneous extras. Microsoft scrapped this idea with Vista, but instead are offering such bonuses to those who handed over their hard-earned cash for the Ultimate edition. There are currently no Extras available, but Hold 'Em Poker and a new application called DreamScene (Desktop video overlay) will be at launch. Past this, there is no telling exactly what we can expect from the Extras or whether or not it will be worth your time. Looking into the "About Ultimate Extras" screen, it will list off potential benefits that will come to you over time. First listed is cutting edge programs, which could include updated/new utilities or even games. Innovative services is the second...

Should you buy Vista Ultimate?

Page 249 –

Rob Williams