by Rob Williams on May 31, 2015 in Graphics & Displays
In advance of the launch of AMD’s next-generation Radeons, NVIDIA has decided to give gamers another compelling reason to consider GeForce. Its latest card is called the GTX 980 Ti, and its performance comes a lot closer to TITAN X than GTX 980. It sports 6GB of VRAM, costs $649, and could make AMD’s job a lot harder.
We don’t make it a point to seek out automated gaming benchmarks, but we do like to get a couple in that anyone reading this can run themselves. Of these, Futuremark’s name leads the pack, as its benchmarks have become synonymous with the activity. Plus, it does help that the company’s benchmarks stress PCs to their limit – and beyond.
According to 3DMark, the 980 Ti is between 27~30% faster than the original 980.
Unigine Heaven 4.0
Unigine might not have as established a name as Futuremark, but its products are nothing short of “awesome”. The company’s main focus is its game engine, but a by-product of that is its benchmarks, which are used to both give benchmarkers another great tool to take advantage of, and also to show-off what its engine is capable of. It’s a win-win all-around.
The biggest reason that the company’s “Heaven” benchmark is so relied-upon by benchmarkers is that both AMD and NVIDIA promote it for its heavy use of tessellation. Like 3DMark, the benchmark here is overkill by design, so results are not going to directly correlate with real gameplay. Rather, they showcase which card models can better handle both DX11 and its GPU-bogging features.
Heaven is even kinder to the 980 Ti than 3DMark was; here we see an FPS improvement of 38%.