Zotac GeForce GTX 285 & GTX 295

by Rob Williams on January 27, 2009 in Graphics & Displays

When NVIDIA released their GTX 285 and 295 earlier this month, they successfully reclaimed the performance crown for both single and dual-GPU graphics cards. We’re finally putting both of these models through our grueling testing, in both single card and SLI configurations, to see just how much value can be had when compared to previous offerings.

Page 4 – Crysis Warhead

As PC enthusiasts, we tend to be drawn to games that offer spectacular graphics… titles that help reaffirm your belief that shelling out lots of cash for that high-end monitor and PC was well worth it. But it’s rare when a game comes along that is so visually-demanding, it’s unable to run fully maxed out on even the highest-end systems on the market. In the case of the original Crysis, it’s easy to see that’s what Crytek was going for.

Funny enough, even though Crysis was released close to a year ago, the game today still has difficulty running at 2560×1600 with full detail settings – and that’s even with overlooking the use of anti-aliasing! Luckily, Warhead is better optimized and will run smoother on almost any GPU, despite looking just as gorgeous as its predecessor, as you can see in the screenshot below.

The game includes four basic profiles to help you adjust the settings based on how good your system is. These include Entry, Mainstream, Gamer and Enthusiast – the latter of which is for the biggest of systems out there, unless you have a sweet graphics card and are only running 1680×1050. We run our tests at the Gamer setting as it’s very demanding on any current GPU and is a proper baseline of the level of detail that hardcore gamers would demand from the game.

Only Crysis has the ability to prove to you just how inept that expensive graphics card of yours is, and it does a great job of that. Surprisingly, even with two GTX 295’s at 2560×1600, we were still barely able to tap the 60 FPS mark, and that’s without even a pinch of Anti-Aliasing! From a 1680×1050 perspective, any card will play the game just fine with the Gamer Profile, and for the most part, not much changes at 1920×1200.

Our top resolution of 2560×1600 is a far different story, though, as only three of our GPU configurations delivered enough power to be able to run the game at above 30 FPS, a range that I personally find suitable for normal gameplay. Even 30 FPS isn’t ideal, but I don’t think the performance is low enough to keep people away from enjoying improved visuals.

It’s pretty clear here. To enjoy this game at the Gamer setting without moving to an SLI setup, the only choice right now is the GTX 295, which came close to offering 40 FPS on average. Zotac’s AMP! GTX 285 came close to the 30 FPS we’d like to see, but no cigar.

Graphics Card
Best Playable
Avg. FPS
NVIDIA GTX 295 1792MB x 2
2560×1600 – Enthusiast, 0xAA
42.507 FPS
NVIDIA GTX 285 1GB x 2
2560×1600 – Gamer, 0xAA
45.835 FPS
Zotac GTX 295 1792MB
2560×1600 – Gamer, 0xAA
37.97 FPS
Zotac GTX 285 1GB AMP!
2560×1600 – Mainstream, 0xAA
53.308 FPS
2560×1600 – Mainstream, 0xAA
51.283 FPS
Palit GTX 280 1GB
2560×1600 – Mainstream, 0xAA
46.912 FPS
XFX GTX 260/216 896MB
2560×1600 – Mainstream, 0xAA
40.750 FPS
Diamond HD 4870 1GB
2560×1600 – Mainstream, 0xAA
33.849 FPS
Palit HD 4870 X2 2GB
2560×1600 – Mainstream, 0xAA
30.670 FPS

For the first time, we’ve finally seen a GPU configuration that would allow the Enthusiast setting at the ultra-high resolution of 2560×1600. Granted, it requires two $500 GPUs, but the fact that it can be done is impressive. The 42.507 FPS being delivered sure isn’t jaw-dropping, but it’s plenty-enough to deliver smooth gameplay at oh-so-gorgeous settings.

From a single-GPU perspective, the GTX 295 once again offers the best bang for the buck where quality and average FPS is concerned. SLI’d GTX 285’s improve upon that result by about 7 FPS, but $300 would also be tacked onto the cost-of-entry, so there’s a definite trade-off. Where the GTX 285 is concerned, it has easily become the fastest single-card single-GPU offering available today, and this table proves it. Sadly, at 2560×1600, the profile had to be kicked down to Mainstream, but for 1920×1200, the Gamer profile can be used just fine for any of the cards listed here.

Support our efforts! With ad revenue at an all-time low for written websites, we're relying more than ever on reader support to help us continue putting so much effort into this type of content. You can support us by becoming a Patron, or by using our Amazon shopping affiliate links listed through our articles. Thanks for your support!

Rob Williams

Rob founded Techgage in 2005 to be an 'Advocate of the consumer', focusing on fair reviews and keeping people apprised of news in the tech world. Catering to both enthusiasts and businesses alike; from desktop gaming to professional workstations, and all the supporting software.

twitter icon facebook icon instagram icon