AMD Ryzen 3 3100 & 3300X Quad-core CPU Performance Review

AMD Zen 2 Ryzen 3 Packaging
Print
by Rob Williams on June 22, 2020 in Processors

With its Ryzen 3 3100 and 3300X quad-core processors, AMD is delivering some new options to those who want to build a new rig on the cheap. Fortunately, today’s ~$100 processors are pretty powerful, with both of these options impressing us in various ways. So, let’s walk through an onslaught of test results across workstation and gaming workloads to see how these chips stack up.

Page 5 – Rendering: Arnold, Blender, KeyShot, V-Ray Next

There are few things we find quite as satisfying as rendering: seeing a bunch of assets thrown into a viewport that turn into a beautiful scene. Rendering also happens to be one of the best possible examples of what can take advantage of as much PC hardware as you can throw at it. This is true both for CPUs and GPUs.

On this page and next, we’re tackling many different renderers, because not all renderers behave the same way. That will be proven in a few cases. If you don’t see a renderer that applies to you, it could to some degree in the future, should you decide to make a move to a different design suite or renderer. An example: V-Ray supports more than just 3ds Max; it also supports Cinema 4D, Maya, Rhino, SketchUp, and Houdini.

Autodesk Arnold

Autodesk Arnold CPU Render Performance - Jaguar E-Type Scene (AMD Ryzen 3 3300X and 3100)
Autodesk Arnold CPU Render Performance - Sophie Scene (AMD Ryzen 3 3300X and 3100)

For our first rendering test, we get quick proof that low-end CPUs are not going to get the job done too quickly. Yet again, we’d never suggest focusing only on the CPU for rendering, since more and more heterogeneous (or NVIDIA OptiX) options are popping up. Arnold in particular supports CUDA-equipped GPUs, which uses OptiX by default.

Blender – CPU

Blender 2.83 Cycles CPU Render Performance - BMW (AMD Ryzen 3 3300X and 3100)
Blender 2.83 Cycles CPU Render Performance - Classroom (AMD Ryzen 3 3300X and 3100)
Blender 2.83 Cycles CPU Render Performance - Controller (AMD Ryzen 3 3300X and 3100)

These Blender results might stand out due to the fact that there are many more CPU models involved than in the other tests (including dual Intel 10th-gen). That’s because this performance was pulled from our recent in-depth look at Blender 2.83. We’d suggest checking that out for a lot more information, including tile size considerations and viewport performance.

AMD’s two new Ryzen 3s not surprisingly fall to the bottom of this pile, but that’s again helped by the fact that they are effectively the lowest-end of the bunch. While a chip like the six-core Ryzen 5 3600X costs about twice as much as the 3300X, it’s clear that those extra cores open up a lot more breathing room.

What happens when a GPU is added in?

Blender – CPU + GPU

Blender 2.83 Cycles CPU+GPU Render Performance - BMW (AMD Ryzen 3 3300X and 3100)
Blender 2.83 Cycles CPU+GPU Render Performance - Classroom (AMD Ryzen 3 3300X and 3100)
Blender 2.83 Cycles CPU+GPU Render Performance - Controller (AMD Ryzen 3 3300X and 3100)

Performance scaling changes a lot with heterogeneous rendering, in some cases making the CPU choice matter far less than a GPU one. That said, as always, you don’t want to skimp on a CPU, because if you’re trying to get creative work done, you don’t want to force yourself to straddle the line of acceptable performance like this. Blender is very unlikely to be the only tool you’re running, and once you start loading up multiple tools or general software, extra cores is going to deliver a better experience.

KeyShot

Luxion KeyShot 9 - Character Render Performance (AMD Ryzen 3 3300X and 3100)
Luxion KeyShot 9 - Room Render Performance (AMD Ryzen 3 3300X and 3100)

As we discovered in our in-depth look at KeyShot 9 back in January, we noticed that most of our CPU projects scaled identically across-the-board, and as it happens, we don’t see a great deal of deviation with these two chosen projects in our latest testing. Overall, everything scales here according to our expectations.

It’s worth noting that KeyShot is another solution that has gained NVIDIA GPU rendering support, and in many cases, that could improve your overall rendering speed quite a bit. That said, we’ve found in our testing that 8GB graphics cards need to be considered the starting-point for KeyShot, and you may have to make some changes to your scene to have it render properly. Thankfully, all you have to do is click the GPU mode in KeyShot and get immediate feedback.

Chaos Group V-Ray Next – CPU

Chaos Group V-Ray - Flowers CPU Render Performance (AMD Ryzen 3 3300X and 3100)
Chaos Group V-Ray - Flowers CPU+GPU Render Performance (AMD Ryzen 3 3300X and 3100)

The CPU set of results scales as we’d expect, but the CPU + GPU results shake things up. At first, we believed something was wrong with our Intel results, but based on previous testing, scaling between models remains similar. For some reason, Intel’s chips just struggle here, to the point that the 8-core falls behind the 6-core. We’re not sure why this is the case, but this is one downside of only having one project to test with.

Things do change up for Intel with the standalone benchmark:

V-Ray Next Benchmark

Chaos Group V-Ray Next Benchmark - CPU Render Score (AMD Ryzen 3 3300X and 3100)
Chaos Group V-Ray Next Benchmark - CPU+GPU Render Score (AMD Ryzen 3 3300X and 3100)

Now this is more like the scaling we’d expect to see. Because V-Ray gives you the option to render to both the CPU and GPU, both processors could be weighed heavily into your considerations. That said, the above performance ignores performance with NVIDIA OptiX, something we’ll have a fair bit of data to present for soon.

Support our efforts! With ad revenue at an all-time low for written websites, we're relying more than ever on reader support to help us continue putting so much effort into this type of content. You can support us by becoming a Patron, or by using our Amazon shopping affiliate links listed through our articles. Thanks for your support!

Rob Williams

Rob founded Techgage in 2005 to be an 'Advocate of the consumer', focusing on fair reviews and keeping people apprised of news in the tech world. Catering to both enthusiasts and businesses alike; from desktop gaming to professional workstations, and all the supporting software.

twitter icon facebook icon instagram icon