by Rob Williams on November 21, 2008 in Graphics & Displays
Picking out a new graphics card is easier to do now than ever, as there seems to be a model to cover every single price-range, and not just from one single GPU manufacturer, either. Today’s card is one that represents the ~$125 price spot and is designed as a step-up from the 9600 GT, with ASUS applying their usual TLC to help add even more appeal.
As PC enthusiasts, we tend to be drawn to games that offer spectacular graphics… titles that help reaffirm your belief that shelling out lots of cash for that high-end monitor and PC was well worth it. But it’s rare when a game comes along that is so visually-demanding, it’s unable to run fully maxed out on even the highest-end systems on the market. In the case of the original Crysis, it’s easy to see that’s what Crytek was going for.
Funny enough, even though Crysis was released close to a year ago, the game today still has difficulty running at 2560×1600 with full detail settings – and that’s even with overlooking the use of anti-aliasing! Luckily, Warhead is better optimized and will run smoother on almost any GPU, despite looking just as gorgeous as its predecessor, as you can see in the screenshot below.

The game includes four basic profiles to help you adjust the settings based on how good your system is. These include Entry, Mainstream, Gamer and Enthusiast – the latter of which is for the biggest of systems out there, unless you have a sweet graphics card and are only running 1680×1050. We run our tests at the Gamer setting as it’s very demanding on any current GPU and is a proper baseline of the level of detail that hardcore gamers would demand from the game.



As we’d expect from this card, performance over the 9600 GT is quite good, but being still a low-end model, the “Gamer” setting is simply not possible.
|
|
|
Palit HD 4870 X2 2GB
|
2560×1600, Gamer, 0xAA
|
31.382 FPS
|
Palit 9800 GX2 1GB
|
2560×1600, Mainstream, 0xAA
|
50.550 FPS
|
Palit GTX 280 1GB
|
2560×1600, Mainstream, 0xAA
|
46.038 FPS
|
XFX GTX 260/216 896MB
|
2560×1600, Mainstream, 0xAA
|
45.940 FPS
|
ASUS 9800 GTX+ 512MB
|
2560×1600, Mainstream, 0xAA
|
34.319 FPS
|
Palit HD 4870 512MB
|
2560×1600, Mainstream, 0xAA
|
32.973 FPS
|
ASUS 9800 GTX 512MB
|
2560×1600, Mainstream, 0xAA
|
30.840 FPS
|
ASUS HD 4850 512MB
|
2560×1600, Mainstream, 0xAA
|
26.530 FPS
|
ASUS 9800 GT 512MB
|
2560×1600, Mainstream, 0xAA
|
26.123 FPS
|
Gigabyte 9600 GT 512MB
|
1920×1200, Mainstream, 0xAA
|
31.979 FPS
|
Surprisingly, though, unlike the 9600 GT, the 9800 GT managed to handle the game using the Mainstream setting at 2650×1600 just fine. The frame rate is a little low (30FPS is ideal), but it’s still fully playable.