by Rob Williams on March 26, 2007 in Systems
ASUS has a new notebook offering that is sure to please most. It includes a fast T7200 processor, NVIDIA 7700 Go graphics card and 1GB of ram. It’s also very competitively priced at just under $1,500. Is it worth your consideration?
In our two year run, we haven’t reviewed that many laptops. This is the third, actually. Therefore, we haven’t yet finalized our testing scheme, but as we write more notebook articles, we will refine our processes. To test today, I will be comparing a few things to the recently reviewed Lamborghini VX1, also from ASUS.
Before testing, the computer is cleaned up of junk applications. The two most notable applications to be removed before testing was Norton Internet Security 2005 and also Skype. Other non-essential applications were closed. The only applications that remained running were laptop specific, including the power schemes and other various ASUS utilities.
First we have a slew of popular benchmarks, including Futuremark and Sandra. When it came to anything that involved graphics, the A8Js clobbered the VX1. The VX1 strikes back in all CPU related tests though, thanks to it’s ~10% faster clock speed.
Benchmark
|
ASUS Lamborghini VX1
|
ASUS A8JS
|
3D Mark 01 |
15660 |
22467 |
3D Mark 06 Overall |
830 |
2675 |
3D Mark 06 CPU |
1840 |
1737 |
PC Mark 05 |
4274 |
4699 |
HD Tune |
66.3MB/s Burst
34.7MB/s Average
17ms Latency *
|
67.4MB/s Burst
33.0MB/s Average
17.8ms Latency * |
HD Tach |
84.5MB/s Burst
36.8MB/s Average
16.2ms Latency * |
116.7MB/s Burst
35.1MB/s Average
16.9ms Latency * |
Super Pi |
1 M – 24.156s *
8 M – 306.15s *
|
1 M – 25.938s *
8 M – 330.70s * |
Sandra Arithmetic |
19813 / 13607 |
18410 / 12665 |
Sandra Multi-Media |
117174 / 63395 |
109386 / 59096 |
Sandra Memory |
3942 / 3949 |
3574 / 3596 |
* denotes that a lower score is better.
For our real world tests, simple scenarios were executed. The DVD playback and book reading tests were done using SysMark 2004 SE. The VX1 proved better in all battery related tests. Not surprising since it has a larger capacity.
Real World Benchmark
|
ASUS Lamborghini VX1
|
ASUS A8JS
|
Depleted Battery to Fully Charged * |
2h 30m |
1h 50m |
DVD Playback On Battery |
2h 36m |
2h 14m |
Book Reading on Battery |
2h 59m |
2h 25m |
DVD Ripping * |
31m 33s |
30m 01s |
CD Rip to FLAC * |
18m 58s |
19m 23s |
* denotes that a lower score is better.
Since this laptop has a rather nice GPU, I chose to use five games for testing. I had a manual run through each game at both 1024×768 and the LCDs native resolution of 1440×900. The only game that was not run in native was NFS: Carbon, because EA refuses to support widescreen. Results are average FPS which were recorded with FRAPS 2.8.2 over the course of 3 – 5 minutes, depending on the game and level.
Game
|
1024×768
|
1440×900
|
Half-Life 2: Episode 2 |
85.983 |
53.800 |
Oblivion |
45.817 |
37.800 |
Call of Duty 2 |
28.958 |
20.008 |
Ghost Recon: AW |
34.367 |
22.483 |
NFS: Carbon |
20.933 |
N/A |
Every single one of the games ran great at 1024×768, which the exception of Half-Life 2 which has a habit of stuttering. Even Oblivion ran fantastic, I was impressed. At native resolution however, both CoD and Ghost Recon were not really playable. You -could- play CoD2 if you really wanted the sharper image, but GRAW was actually laggy at certain points.
I was pleased overall with the performance, especially at 1024×768. Oblivion ran at an average of 45FPS though at native resolution.. hard to complain about this.