A Look At Intel Core i9-9900K Workstation & Gaming Performance

Intel Core i9-9900K Packaging
Print
by Rob Williams on November 30, 2018 in Processors

There’s a lot to like about Intel’s Core i9-9900K that goes beyond adding 33% more cores over last year’s i7-8700K. The 9900K can peak at 5GHz, and barely throttles back when all eight cores are engaged. Add to that the introduction of solder TIM, a chip like the 9900K has been a long time coming, so let’s dive in.

Page 2 – Test Methodology & Systems

Benchmarking a CPU may sound like a simple enough task, but in order to deliver accurate, repeatable results, and not to mention results that don’t favor one vendor over another, strict guidelines need to be adhered to. That in turn makes for rigorous, time-consuming testing, but we feel that the effort is worth it.

This page exists so that we can be open about how we test, and give those who care about testing procedures an opportunity to review our methodology before flaming us in the comments. Here, you can see a breakdown of all of our test machines, specifics about the tests themselves, and other general information that might be useful.

Let’s start with a look at the test platforms, for AMD’s TR4 (MSI’s MEG X399 Creation and Aorus’ X399 GAMING 7) and AM4 (ASUS’ CROSSHAIR VII HERO), along with Intel’s LGA2011-v3 (ASUS’ ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING), and LGA1151 (EVGA Z370 FTW and ASUS’ ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING).

To prevent unexpected performance results, the “Multi-Core Enhancement” optimizations (effectively overclocking all cores to max turbo, instead of just two cores) offered by ASUS on its respective motherboards is disabled. There is, however, an exception. For Ryzen 2 testing, we have to use the DOCP profile on the motherboard to take proper advantage of the memory kit (though that doesn’t appear to overclock anything).

All platforms were run with DDR4-3200 speeds, and 14-14-14 timings. Accomplishing that kind of thing used to be extremely difficult, but fortunately it’s a lot easier today, and helps us keep things as close to apples-to-apples as possible.

Here’s the full breakdown of the test rigs:

Techgage’s CPU Testing Platforms

AMD TR4 Test Platform #1
Processor AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX (3.0GHz, 32C/64T)
Motherboard MSI MEG X399 Creation
CPU tested with BIOS 1.0EN43 (Jul 27, 2018)
Memory G.SKILL TridentZ (F4-3200C14-8GTZ) 8GB x 4
Operates at DDR4-3200 14-14-14 (1.35V)
Graphics NVIDIA TITAN Xp (12GB; GeForce 398.82)
Storage Host OS: WD Blue 3D NAND 1TB (SATA 6Gbps)
Scratch Drive: Samsung 970 EVO 512GB (NVMe)
Power Supply Cooler Master Silent Pro Hybrid (1300W)
Chassis Cooler Master MasterCase H500P Mesh
Cooling Cooler Master Wraithripper Tower Cooler
Et cetera Windows 10 Pro (Build 17134), Ubuntu 18.04 (4.15 kernel)
AMD TR4 Test Platform #2
Processor AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X (3.5GHz, 16C/32T)
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (3.4GHz, 16C/32T)
Motherboard GIGABYTE X399 Aorus Gaming 7
CPU tested with BIOS F10 (July 10, 2018)
Memory G.SKILL Flare X (F4-3200C14-8GFX) 8GB x 4
Operates at DDR4-3200 14-14-14 (1.35V)
Graphics NVIDIA TITAN Xp (12GB; GeForce 398.82)
Storage Host OS: WD Blue 3D NAND 1TB (SATA 6Gbps)
Scratch Drive: Samsung 970 EVO 512GB (NVMe)
Power Supply Enermax RevoBron 80+ Bronze (600W)
Chassis Enermax Equilence
Cooling Enermax Liqtech TR4 AIO (240mm)
Et cetera Windows 10 Pro (Build 17134), Ubuntu 18.04 (4.15 kernel)
As tested configuration: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
As tested configuration: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
As tested configuration: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

There’s not too much to say here outside of the fact that since we wanted to keep the 2990WX to its own machine for further testing, the 2950X was tested in the same motherboard as the 1950X. That gave us a chance to test a new Threadripper in a year-old motherboard, and we can report it’s been flawless (we flashed the latest EFI with the 1950X still in the board, which made things a touch easier).


AMD AM4 Test Platform
Processors AMD Ryzen 7 2700X (3.7GHz, 8C/16T)
Motherboard ASUS Crosshair VII HERO Wi-Fi
CPU tested with BIOS 0804 (July 9, 2018)
Memory G.SKILL Flare X (F4-3200C14-8GFX) 8GB x 4
Operates at DDR4-3200 14-14-14 (1.35V)
Graphics NVIDIA TITAN Xp (12GB; GeForce 398.82)
Storage Host OS: WD Blue 3D NAND 1TB (SATA 6Gbps)
Scratch Drive: Samsung 970 EVO 512GB (NVMe)
Power Supply EVGA Bronze 600B1 (600W)
Chassis Fractal Design Define C
Cooling Noctua NH-U12S SE-AM4 (1x120mm)
Et cetera Windows 10 Pro (Build 17134), Ubuntu 18.04 (4.15 kernel)
As tested configuration: AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

Nothing special had to be done on the CROSSHAIR VII HERO to get up and running quickly. As covered above, we had to run with the DOCP Standard profile to get the memory to run at optimum settings. Again, in testing, we couldn’t see how that improves performance outside of applying the proper memory settings, so we believe the setting requires further input for an actual boost to performance (eg: overclocking).


Intel LGA2011-3 Test Platform
Processors Intel Core i9-7980XE (2.6GHz, 18C/36T)
Intel Core i9-7960X (2.8GHz, 16C/32T)
Intel Core i9-7900X (3.3GHz, 10C/20T)
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING
CPU tested with BIOS 1004 (Nov 14, 2017)
Memory G.SKILL TridentZ (F4-3200C14-8GTZ) 8GB x 4
Operates at DDR4-3200 14-14-14 (1.35V)
Graphics NVIDIA TITAN Xp (12GB; GeForce 398.82)
Storage Host OS: WD Blue 3D NAND 1TB (SATA 6Gbps)
Scratch Drive: Samsung 970 EVO 512GB (NVMe)
Power Supply Corsair Professional Series Gold AX1200 (1200W)
Chassis Corsair Carbide 600C
Cooling NZXT Kraken X62 AIO (280mm)
Et cetera Windows 10 Pro (Build 17134), Ubuntu 18.04 (4.15 kernel)
As tested configuration: Intel Core i9-7980XE
As tested configuration: Intel Core i9-7960X
As tested configuration: Intel Core i9-7900X

This ASUS motherboard tries to trick us into accepting core boost optimizations after selecting the XMP profile. That’s disregarded, to keep things as apples-to-apples as possible.


Intel LGA1151 Test Platform #1
Processors Intel Core i7-8700K (3.7GHz, 6C/12T)
Motherboard EVGA Z370 FTW
CPU tested with BIOS 1.08 (March 20, 2018)
Memory G.SKILL Flare X (F4-3200C14-8GFX) 8GB x 4
Operates at DDR4-3200 14-14-14 (1.35V)
Graphics NVIDIA TITAN Xp (12GB; GeForce 398.82)
Storage Host OS: WD Blue 3D NAND 1TB (SATA 6Gbps)
Scratch Drive: Samsung 970 EVO 512GB (NVMe)
Power Supply Corsair RM650X (1200W)
Chassis NZXT S340 Elite Mid-tower
Cooling Corsair Hydro H100i V2 AIO Liquid Cooler (240mm)
Et cetera Windows 10 Pro (Build 17134), Ubuntu 18.04 (4.15 kernel)
Intel LGA1151 Test Platform #2
Processors Intel Core i9-9900K (3.6GHz, 8C/16T)
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX Z390-E Gaming
CPU tested with BIOS 0602 (October 19 , 2018)
Memory G.SKILL TridentZ (F4-3200C14-8GTZ) 8GB x 4
Operates at DDR4-3200 14-14-14 (1.35V)
Graphics NVIDIA TITAN Xp (12GB; GeForce 398.82)
Storage Host OS: WD Blue 3D NAND 1TB (SATA 6Gbps)
Power Supply Corsair RM650X (1200W)
Chassis NZXT S340 Elite Mid-tower
Cooling Corsair Hydro H100i V2 AIO Liquid Cooler (240mm)
Et cetera Windows 10 Pro (Build 17134), Ubuntu 18.04 (4.19.4 kernel)
As tested configuration: Intel Core i9-9900K
As tested configuration: Intel Core i7-8700K

On the EVGA board, there’s nothing strange to report, because there’s no boosts built-in after setting the DRAM to 3200. The ASUS motherboard did offer to apply core optimizations for the 9900K, which we rejected.

Testing Considerations

For the bulk of our testing, we use Windows 10 build 17134 with full updates as the base. Our basic guidelines are:

  • Everything is disabled in “Customize settings” during OS install.
  • 3D Vision and GeForce Experience are not installed with the graphics driver.
  • Services are disabled: Search, Cortana, User Account Control, and Defender.
  • Most preinstalled Windows Store bloatware is uninstalled.
  • The “Ultimate Performance” power profile is used, and screen timeouts are disabled.
  • All notifications are disabled.
  • Desktop resolution is run at 2560×1440.
  • Testing doesn’t begin until the PC is idle (keeps a steady minimum wattage).
  • OSes are never transplanted from one machine to another.
  • The “This PC” icon is added to the desktop (hey – it’s important!)

Encoding Tests

Encoding: Adobe Premiere Pro (Media Encoder)
Encoding: LameXP
Encoding: MAGIX Vegas

Adobe Premiere Pro
LameXP
MAGIX Vegas

(You can click each name to go straight to that result.)


Rendering Tests

Rendering: Adobe Dimension CC
Rendering: Arnold in Maya 2018
Rendering: Blender
Rendering: Cinebench
Rendering: Cinema 4D
Rendering: Corona in 3ds Max 2019
Rendering: KeyShot
Rendering: POV-Ray
Rendering: Radeon ProRender in Maya 2018
Rendering: V-Ray Next in 3ds Max 2019
Rendering: V-Ray Benchmark

Adobe Dimension
Arnold (Maya 2018) (Also relevant to: 3ds Max, C4D, Houdini, Katana, Softimage)
Blender
Cinebench
Cinema 4D
Corona (3ds Max 2019) (Also relevant to: C4D)
KeyShot
POV-Ray
Radeon ProRender (Maya 2018) (Also relevant to: 3ds Max, Blender, C4D, SolidWorks)
V-Ray Next (3ds Max 2019) (Also relevant to: C4D, Houdini, Maya, Rhino, SketchUp)
V-Ray Benchmark
SiSoftware Sandra 2018

(You can click each name to go straight to that result.)


Gaming Tests

UL 3DMark

(You can click each name to go straight to that result.)


If you think there’s some information lacking on this page, or you simply want clarification on anything in particular, don’t hesitate to leave a comment.

Support our efforts! With ad revenue at an all-time low for written websites, we're relying more than ever on reader support to help us continue putting so much effort into this type of content. You can support us by becoming a Patron, or by using our Amazon shopping affiliate links listed through our articles. Thanks for your support!

Rob Williams

Rob founded Techgage in 2005 to be an 'Advocate of the consumer', focusing on fair reviews and keeping people apprised of news in the tech world. Catering to both enthusiasts and businesses alike; from desktop gaming to professional workstations, and all the supporting software.

twitter icon facebook icon instagram icon